On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 23:13 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > So still keep MEMBLOCK_ERROR to (~(phys_addr_t)0) ? No point for now. lmb_alloc() etc... are defined as returning 0 for failure so we would need to fix that too. As I said in a previous email we do need to revisit the memblock error handling. > We can change some variable from unsigned long to phys_addr_t that > will be assigned by memblock_find_base(). > > that could avoid casting too. That would be a good idea anyways if those are indeed carrying a physical address. Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
