Re: LMB bits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 15:34 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:38:06 +1000
> > 
> > > Ok pushed.
> > 
> > Your current tree headed by 94f4de71740edb80dfbd3916fe83308d545a4419
> > works fine for me.
> 
> Thanks Dave.
> 
> Ingo, Linus, how to you want to proceed ? We could get the rename patch in 
> now, that would make things easier for the ARM folks who have started using 
> LMB as well and are currently clashing in linux-next, and keep the rest of 
> the rework for the merge window ? Or keep the whole thing for the merge 
> window ?

I'd suggest you send a pull request to Linus with the rename - it is purely 
mechanical, tested and it will make life much easier in the merge window. 
Also, we are shortly after -rc5 now so should there be any fallout, there's 
enough time until -rc6.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux