On 07/08/2010 11:55 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sunday, July 04, 2010 12:56:07 am Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> - pr_info(" %s[0x%x]\t0x%016llx - 0x%016llx, 0x%llx bytes\n",
>> - name, i, base, base + size - 1, size);
>> + pr_info(" %s[%#x]\t[%#016llx - %#016llx], %#llx bytes\n",
>> + name, i, base, base + size, size);
>
> I know you think it's prettier to have zeroes and extra spaces like this:
>
> [0xe7000000 - 0xe8000000, 0x1000000 bytes]
>
> rather than a bunch of 'F's:
>
> [0xe7000000-0xe7ffffff]
>
> But for the record, I still think you're wrong and that it's better
> to be consistent even if it's slightly uglier. The inconsistencies
> lead to confusion and off-by-one errors.
We can make them to be consistent later.
current for early mem stage, it is consistent to without -1.
later I like to see all pci resource could be consistent to without -1 too.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
