On 07/08/2010 11:55 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Sunday, July 04, 2010 12:56:07 am Yinghai Lu wrote: >> - pr_info(" %s[0x%x]\t0x%016llx - 0x%016llx, 0x%llx bytes\n", >> - name, i, base, base + size - 1, size); >> + pr_info(" %s[%#x]\t[%#016llx - %#016llx], %#llx bytes\n", >> + name, i, base, base + size, size); > > I know you think it's prettier to have zeroes and extra spaces like this: > > [0xe7000000 - 0xe8000000, 0x1000000 bytes] > > rather than a bunch of 'F's: > > [0xe7000000-0xe7ffffff] > > But for the record, I still think you're wrong and that it's better > to be consistent even if it's slightly uglier. The inconsistencies > lead to confusion and off-by-one errors. We can make them to be consistent later. current for early mem stage, it is consistent to without -1. later I like to see all pci resource could be consistent to without -1 too. Thanks Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html