On Friday 02 July 2010, Chris Metcalf wrote: > So, if there's a good reason for it to be there, I'd say that pushes us > back toward a separate <linux/list_types.h>. Otherwise we can > investigate splitting out the prefetch content on every platform to > <asm/prefetch.h> (presumably creating some empty <asm/prefetch.h> > headers on architectures that just use the gcc builtin) and adding new > #includes of <asm/prefetch.h> to files that reference the prefetch > functionality. Arnd and other list folks, what's your instinct? Makes sense. Splitting out the list types from list.h does seem to be safest option. We might actually be able to do some header file untangling that way, by using list_types.h in all headers that use a list_head by none of the macros and functions associated with it. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
