On Saturday 29 May 2010 13:29:10 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 29 May 2010, Chris Metcalf wrote: > > > > Thanks to some much-appreciated volunteer work reviewing that initial > > patch, I now have a revised set of patches which I would like to offer > > for submission to the mainline. > > It seems that you have addressed all my review comments and all the > other comments that I have seen in the best possible ways. > All the controversial parts from the original code are either corrected > or (in case of nonessential drivers) deferred to a future review. > I did not expect this to be possibly in such a short time, and it > continues to amaze me. > > Consequently, I fully support this series to go into 2.6.35. > To the entire series: > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> Hi Chris, You evidently didn't make it into -rc1, probably because Linus considered your submission to be too late, or possibly because some of the bigger patches got lost in an email filter. To go forward with your architecture, I suggest that you start adding it to the linux-next tree. Until you have a git tree, the easiest way to do that is to put a tarball in quilt format at a http url under your control, and ask Stephen to include that. Feel free to add a 'Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>' to your existing patches, and do your further work as patches on top of that. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
