From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 15:27:46 +1000 > Hmm, I'm missing something. David, back up a second, as far as I can see, > with Anton's patches, atomic_read() *is* effectively just ACCESS_ONCE() > now. Linus pointed out that header tangle is the reason not to just use > the macro. My bad, I was under the impression that the proposal was to remove volatile usage and also not even do ACCESS_ONCE() in atomic_read(). And then explicitly annotate call sits that actually need the ACCESS_ONCE() semantic. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
