On 05/18/2010 10:35 PM, Mathieu Rondonneau wrote: > Does it make sense to prevent looking for stolen RAM below the ISA section. > > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Rondonneau <mathieu.rondonneau@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c > index 7bca3c6..322c9c3 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c > @@ -1156,6 +1156,8 @@ void __init e820_reserve_resources_late(void) > end = MAX_RESOURCE_SIZE; > if (start >= end) > continue; > + if (end < ISA_START_ADDRESS) > + continue; > printk(KERN_DEBUG "reserve RAM buffer: %016llx - %016llx ", > start, end); > reserve_region_with_split(&iomem_resource, start, end, do you notice any changes in /proc/iomem? YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html