Re: [PATCH 15/35] x86, lmb: Add lmb_reserve_area_overlap_ok()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/17/2010 03:01 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 10:18 -0700, Yinghai wrote:
>>> No. Both will hit 2.6.36. It's way too late to queue up such changes
>> for
>>> the 2.6.35 merge window which has already opened.
>>
>> i have feeling that your new LMB code will hit 2.6.36. and
>> x86 patches that is using to lmb will hit 2.6.37.
>>
>> otherwise it will make more merge conflicts between tip and lmb.
>> unless put your lmb change to tip?
> 
> There is no reason not to, I'll have them in a separate branch that Ingo
> can pull. I think we can aim for 2.6.36 in one go provided that Peter
> and Thomas are happy with the x86 side of things.
> 

Yes, that's the sane thing to do at this point.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux