Re: [PATCH 15/35] x86, lmb: Add lmb_reserve_area_overlap_ok()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/17/2010 10:18 AM, Yinghai wrote:
>>
>> No. Both will hit 2.6.36. It's way too late to queue up such changes for
>> the 2.6.35 merge window which has already opened.
> 
> i have feeling that your new LMB code will hit 2.6.36. and
> x86 patches that is using to lmb will hit 2.6.37.
> 
> otherwise it will make more merge conflicts between tip and lmb.
> unless put your lmb change to tip?
> 

We can arrange for some way of dealing with this problem... this is not
an issue.

>> Why would it be "too long" ? I keep asking what the heck is going on
>> with having a time bomb on those patches and yet have to get a
>> satisfactory answer.
> 
> why are you thinking that there is time bomb in the patches?

You're the one that keeps saying "that is too long", but without
motivating the hurry.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux