Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:06:25PM -0700, David VomLehn wrote:
The save_ptregs() function has not been tested or even built. I will need
help to complete this.
Signed-off-by: David VomLehn <dvomlehn@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/cris/include/arch-v10/arch/ptrace.h | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/cris/include/arch-v32/arch/ptrace.h | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/cris/include/arch-v10/arch/ptrace.h b/arch/cris/include/arch-v10/arch/ptrace.h
index 2f464ea..28be57c 100644
--- a/arch/cris/include/arch-v10/arch/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/cris/include/arch-v10/arch/ptrace.h
@@ -114,6 +114,86 @@ struct switch_stack {
#define profile_pc(regs) instruction_pointer(regs)
extern void show_regs(struct pt_regs *);
+/* Macros for saving the contents of registers and for the output constraint
+ * for those registers */
+#include "/home/vomlehn/git/kernel.org/ptreg.h"
The above include needs fixing.
I did not look at the rest of your patches - they may suffer the same.
PS: Your To: is seriously broken, I have to hand-edit Cc:s to send the mail
Yes;, and I apologize for this. I've got to track down the reason for
this. before send more
patches.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
