On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 23:03 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > the new lmb could be used to early_res in x86. > > Suggested by: David, Ben, and Thomas I still find most of your changeset comments to be very very poor, if comprehensible at all. You really MUST make an effort there. Cheers, Ben. > -v6: change sequence as requested by Thomas > -v7: seperate them to more patches > -v8: add boundary checking to make sure not free partial page. > -v9: use lmb_debug to control print out of reserve_lmb. > add e820 clean up, and e820 become __initdata > -v10:use lmb.rmo_size and ARCH_DISCARD_LMB according to Michael > change name to lmb_find_area/reserve_lmb_area/free_lmb_area, > according to Michael > update find_lmb_area to use __lmb_alloc_base according to ben > -v11:move find_lmb_area_size back to x86. > x86 has own find_lmb_area, and could be disabled by ARCH_LMB_FIND_AREA > because _lmb_find_base has different behavoir from x86's old one. > one from high to high and one from low to high > need more test > tested for x86 32bit/64bit, numa/nonuma, nobootmem/bootmem. > -v12:refresh the series with current tip > seperate nobootmem.c, so could remove some #ifdef > still keep CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM, in x86 .c, and could use the as tags > so other lmb could refer them to use NO_BOOTMEM. > > still keep find_lmb_area, may replace those find_lmb_area will lmb_alloc, if > everything go fine > > Please put them into tip and -next to have more test coverage. > > Thanks > > Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
