On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 2:26 AM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 6:23 PM Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2025-02-21 at 17:47 +0800, Huacai Chen wrote: > > > Hi, Ruoyao, > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 5:25 PM Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > glibc added support for .gnu.hash in 2006 and .hash has been obsoleted > > > > far before the first LoongArch CPU was taped. Using > > > > --hash-style=sysv might imply unaddressed issues and confuse readers. > > > > > > > > In the past we really had an unaddressed issue: the vdso selftests did > > > > not know how to process .gnu.hash. But it has been addressed by commit > > > > e0746bde6f82 ("selftests/vDSO: support DT_GNU_HASH") now. > > > > > > > > Just drop the option and rely on the linker default, which is likely > > > > "both" (AOSC) or "gnu" (Arch, Debian, Gentoo, LFS) on all LoongArch > > > > distros. > > > What about changing to "--hash-style=both" as most architectures do? > > > > IMO we are more close to ARM64 for the aspect that there are no libc > > (glibc or musl) releases lacking GNU hash support, so I prefer the ARM64 > > way. > > > > Maybe this should be changed for some of other architectures (RISC-V and > > C-SKY?) as well because I guess the only reason they used "both" was > > "hey, without this the self tests don't work on Debian" but this is > > resolved now. Adding a few recipients and Cc for discussion. > OK, maybe we can change it for RISC-V/C-SKY and see what they will. > > Huacai > > > > > -- > > Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University Agreed that as selftests has been fixed, --hash-style=sysv can be removed from more arches. arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile has already removed the option. ( I probably should add more information to https://maskray.me/blog/2022-08-21-glibc-and-dt-gnu-hash :) )