On 2/19/2025 3:29 PM, Michael Kelley wrote:
From: Roman Kisel <romank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2025 5:43 PM
[...]
}
These changes to rename hv_dev to vmbus_root_device, along with the
introduction of hv_get_vmbus_root_device(), seem like a separate
patch from the vPCI changes. The rename is definitely needed because
"hv_dev" as a symbol is very overloaded. But the rename is "no functional
change", and it doesn't touch the pci-hyperv.c file. You don't have a
consumer for hv_get_vmbus_root_device() until the vPCI changes, but
that seems OK to me to be in the subsequent patch.
Thanks, will split the NFC out! I've asked the ACPI maintainers if a
small change in ACPI would be fine to make the functional part of this
patch more palatable, too.
--
Thank you,
Roman
