Re: [PATCH 07/31] lmb: Add reserve_lmb/free_lmb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 17:03 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 
> in short: It could make us to avoid use the range that we are going to
> reserve,
>       when we try to get new position new lmb.reserved.region. 

I'm not too sure I follow you. For the resizing, I would just basically
call a low level variant of alloc (__lmb_alloc ?) that explicitely
doesn't honor the total-2 "reserved" entries in the array.

Ie. It should all be one single find/allocation function.

In fact, you want to split lmb_find from lmb_reserve, then just make
lmb_alloc use the above, I don't want 2 implementations of the same
thing (maybe call it __lmb_find to expose the fact that it's a low level
function to avoid for normal use).

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux