On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 12:41 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > I don't see why syscall() can't change the type for its first argument > -- it seems to be exactly what symbol versioning is for. > > Doesn't change the fact that it is fundamentally broken, of course. No need to change the type of the first arg and go for symbol versionning if you do something like I proposed earlier, there will be no conflict between syscall() and __syscall() and both variants can exist. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
