On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 04:22:34PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Earlier, Johannes wrote > > : Humm, now that is a bit disappointing. Because it means we will never > : get rid of bootmem as long as it works for the other architectures. > : And your changeset just added ~900 lines of code, some of it being a > : rather ugly compatibility layer in bootmem that I hoped could go away > : again sooner than later. Whoa! Who's proposing to get rid of bootmem, and why? Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
