On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 08:41:22PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 20:02, Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 07:49:40PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 19:04, Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > For linux-arch: this contains the patch > >> > "MM: Pass a PTE pointer to update_mmu_cache() rather than the PTE itself" > >> > which was previously sent to linux-arch for testing. > >> > >> Documentation/cachetlb.txt still lacks documentation for the `pte' parameter. > >> Can you please fix that? > > > > Didn't I reply to your email about that? No response was forthcoming. > > Yes you did; you said "I'm open to suggestions for a suitable > description for it.". > Sorry, I forgot to reply that I find that a very uncommon attitude... Well, what do you want there? "a pointer to the pte" - that's blatently obvious from the fact that it's C declaration is "pte_t *". -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
