On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:40:29PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > Index: linux-2.6/fs/compat.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/compat.c 2010-01-12 14:08:16.202003005 +0100 > > +++ linux-2.6/fs/compat.c 2010-01-29 23:35:20.187003404 +0100 > > @@ -1795,6 +1795,24 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_select(int n, > > return ret; > > } > > > > +struct compat_sel_arg_struct { > > + compat_ulong_t n; > > + compat_ulong_t inp; > > + compat_ulong_t outp; > > + compat_ulong_t exp; > > + compat_ulong_t tvp; > > +}; > > Shouldn't the last four be compat_uptr_t? Strictly speaking yes, although it doesn't matter for the generated code. The patch below makes it use the strictly correct type: Index: linux-2.6/fs/compat.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/compat.c 2010-02-02 09:20:16.207003623 +0100 +++ linux-2.6/fs/compat.c 2010-02-02 09:20:53.554012789 +0100 @@ -1797,10 +1797,10 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_select(int n, struct compat_sel_arg_struct { compat_ulong_t n; - compat_ulong_t inp; - compat_ulong_t outp; - compat_ulong_t exp; - compat_ulong_t tvp; + compat_uptr_t inp; + compat_uptr_t outp; + compat_uptr_t exp; + compat_uptr_t tvp; }; asmlinkage long compat_sys_old_select(struct compat_sel_arg_struct __user *arg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html