On Sunday 06 December 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > + > +#ifndef __LINUX_SPINLOCK_H > +# error "please don't include this file directly" > +#endif > + Hmm, why not? I think it would be nice to have rwlock.h self-contained to the degree that users of rwlock_t but not spinlock_t only need to include the rwlock header and vice versa. Obviously, we'd have to clean up all the ~200 users of rwlock_t before we're able to remove rwlock.h from spinlock.h, but the other direction could be done easily. Arnd <>< -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
