On Friday 06 November 2009, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Am Freitag 06 November 2009 01:41:44 schrieb Eric W. Biederman: > >> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> In preparation for more invasive cleanups separate the core > >> binary sysctl logic into it's own file. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Hmm, with your patches on Linus git I get the following on s390: > > > > kernel/sysctl_binary.c: In function 'SYSC_sysctl': > > kernel/sysctl_binary.c:126: error: implicit declaration of function > > 'lock_kernel' > > kernel/sysctl_binary.c:129: error: implicit declaration of function > > 'unlock_kernel' > > Bah. A missing smp_lock.h. BTW, there is a patch in the kill-the-BKL tree to push down the BKL further into the sysctl handlers. It may be a good idea to put that into your tree, or to redo the same thing there differently, since you already have a patch series touching this area. Arnd <>< -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
