Re: [RFC][PATCH] kmap_atomic_push

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 23:12 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Do we have any code that uses two slots and then calls more code that
> ultimately requires further slots?  In other words, do we need more than two
> slots?

I can think of code that does a lot more than that, suppose you have
both KM_USER[01], get an interrupt that takes KM_IRQ[01], take an NMI
that takes KM_NMI.

Maybe we can stack the SOFTIRQ ones in as well ;-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux