On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:15:30AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 03:35:44PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > > Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > I don't think this depends on the previous patches in the series... it > > > would probably be easiest if I just merged it with the rest of them > > > though... > > > > The problem I've got is that patch 9/9 depends on this change, but James > > doesn't have your patch in his tree. > > > > I'm planning to submit the tracehook branch immediately after the merge > window opens... would it be a problem to do it in two quick stages? > > Or just drop the parisc hunk until the rest of it goes upstream and then > send that along? > Thanks for just ignoring this. I really appreciate it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html