Re: [PATCH 8/9] KEYS: Extend TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME to (almost) all architectures [try #5]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 08:21:29AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
> index f6bc5d4..6759f45 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -707,4 +707,9 @@ do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int thread_flags, int syscall)
>  {
>  	if (thread_flags & _TIF_SIGPENDING)
>  		do_signal(&current->blocked, regs, syscall);
> +
> +	if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME) {

This still has the same error - is this just a repost of the previous
patch?

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux