Re: [patch 0/8] Allow inlined spinlocks again V5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 04:13:54PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> A third question would be, now that we have this flexible method to 
> inline/uninline locking APIs, mind checking say a 64-bit x86 
> defconfig and see whether that generic set of inline/noinline 
> decisions actually results in the smallest possible kernel image 
> size?
> 
> I.e. we could use this opportunity to re-tune the generic defaults. 
> (and thus your patch-set would become an improvement as well.)

Considering the large x86 user base I have no doubts that you
will easily find volunteers who will be happy to do this :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux