Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 11:42 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:57:56 +0200, Peter Zijlstra said:
> 
> > +/*
> > + * Disable preemption until the scheduler is running.
> > + * Reset by start_kernel()->sched_init()->init_idle().
> > + */
> > +#define INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT	(1)
> > +
> 
> I had to look at this for quite some time before it sank in that it wasn't
> a reset of a #define, or a reset of (1) (anybody else remember changing the
> value of '5' in a Fortran program?).  Especially when stuck in with a bunch
> of cputimer defines. Would have taken even longer if I was looking in sched.h
> for something and not looking at this patch at the same time.
> 
> Can we fix this comment to mention it's thread_info.preempt_count that
> needs the reset?

Something along the lines of the below?

---
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -502,7 +502,9 @@ struct task_cputime {
 
 /*
  * Disable preemption until the scheduler is running.
- * Reset by start_kernel()->sched_init()->init_idle().
+ *
+ * We reset this initial offset of init_thread_info.preempt_count in:
+ *     start_kernel()->sched_init()->init_idle().
  */
 #define INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT	(1)
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux