Re: S+core architecture (arch/score/) support files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



linux-arch-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 写于 2009-06-24 15:07:08:

> The problem is just that if the code is not tested in its
> current configuration it will most likely not work (unless you're a 
perfect 
> coder, but most of us are not). And merging code that doesn't work 
doesn't
> make sense.
> 
> The need for a full retest after the changes inspired by review
> feedback is somewhat annoying -- I agree -- but there's really
> no way around it that I know.
> 
> BTW I'm not saying that LTP is the perfect user test (it's definitely
> not), but it's a relatively useful basic sanity check and you
> should pass something like this at least. Other real user testing would
> be still needed too of course then.

Thanks Andi,

In fact, what I worry about is leaving score outside upstream,
Few person will pay attation to asm-generic/score patches.
When score kernel/glibc finish its update and passed LTP,
We still could not catch up people's suggestion.

Best Regards
Liqin

?韬{.n?????%??檩??w?{.n???{饼??Ф?塄}?财??j:+v??????2??璀??摺?囤??z夸z罐?+?????w棹f


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux