[PATCH 01/10] x86: make pcpu_chunk_addr_search() matching stricter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The @addr passed into pcpu_chunk_addr_search() is unit0 based address
and thus should be matched inside unit0 area.  Currently, when it uses
chunk size when determining whether the address falls in the first
chunk.  Addresses in unitN where N>0 shouldn't be passed in anyway, so
this doesn't cause any malfunction but fix it for consistency.

[ Impact: mostly cleanup ]

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
---
 mm/percpu.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index b149845..19dd83b 100644
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ static struct pcpu_chunk *pcpu_chunk_addr_search(void *addr)
 	void *first_start = pcpu_first_chunk->vm->addr;
 
 	/* is it in the first chunk? */
-	if (addr >= first_start && addr < first_start + pcpu_chunk_size) {
+	if (addr >= first_start && addr < first_start + pcpu_unit_size) {
 		/* is it in the reserved area? */
 		if (addr < first_start + pcpu_reserved_chunk_limit)
 			return pcpu_reserved_chunk;
-- 
1.6.0.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux