Hi Arnd, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> 写于 2009-06-10 02:19:06: > On Tuesday 09 June 2009, liqin.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Hi Arnd, Andrew Morton and linus, > > > > According to your comment on score arch code, > > we update score code base on asm-generic#next repository. > > use arch microblaze and blackfin as reference. > > Ok, just finished looking over the patches and I am generally > very happy about their quality, it usually takes much longer > for a submission of this size to get into a mergeable shape. > > The only thing that I think needs to be fixed before a > 2.6.31 release is my comment about unistd.h still containing > the __ARCH_WANT_SYSCALL_* #defines. I consider that my fault > because I did not make it clear enough what those are meant > for in asm-generic/unistd.h. > > One more general thought: I noticed that you split the header > files by alphabetical ordering. While there is no good way to > split a set of interdependent files, a logical grouping > (e.g. ABI, memory management, device, cpu) would be nice. > > Everything else I found are only polite suggestions of what > can still be improved, not issues that I think need to > be addressed immediately. I especially love how the work > that Remis and I put into the generic header files starts > paying off, because it makes reviewing an architecture so > much simpler. > > Please add my 'Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>' > to your patches. > Based on your comments, I use asm-generic/current.h, hardirq.h, unaligned.h etc instead of files under arch/include/asm folder. It could work in score code. Best Regards Liqin -- ?韬{.n?????%??檩??w?{.n???{饼??Ф?塄}?财??j:+v??????2??璀??摺?囤??z夸z罐?+?????w棹f