Re: Representing Embedded Architectures at the Kernel Summit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Jun 2, 2009, at 12:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:

Which leads me to suggest that it is at least worth having someone with an embedded focus at KS to simply keep an eye out for impacts of generic changes. "Feature parity" is something I often deal with in trying to keep ppc4xx up to
speed with the rest of the archs in the kernel.

I think this is an interesting topic by itself. How to keep embedded (or non-x86) arch's up with features being developed that are core kernel. For example, I know Roland would use 4xx to test his infiniband since it was non-coherent system.

- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux