Re: [RFC] remove bogus CLOCK_TICK_RATE definitions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 14 May 2009, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann writes:
> 
> > PowerPC actually has a number of different time base values
> > per architecture, but maybe 1024000 is a common divisor for
> > all of them.
> 
> It was more that 1024000 is a multiple of all the common HZ values.

I guess in that case powerpc falls into the same category
as ia64, i.e. it makes up a value to keep ACT_HZ from being
harmful, rather than using ACT_HZ for something helpful.

We should consequently drop the powerpc definition along
with the other bogus ones. This will also help the theoretical
CONFIG_HZ=300 case.

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux