Re: "N" symbols and System.map

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 01:10:18AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

right now, we filter out symbols that nm tag N, meaning "debugging
symbols", from System.map.  However, at least on x86, the linker-generated
symbol _end is tagged N, and in fact is the only N in the entire image.

Are there other architectures which would suffer if N were included in
System.map, or would that be a reasonable thing to do?
There should not be any N symbols unless you are using stabs debugging.

We have in vmlinux:
        .end : AT(ADDR(.end) - LOAD_OFFSET) {
                _end = .;
        }


And I see:
c1834000 N _end

This is the _only_ 'N' symbol in my vmlinux.


Yup, this is what happens. I don't know why the linker does this, and if there is a way around it.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux