On Friday 01 May 2009, Alan Cox wrote: > Currently if you create a new architecture you have to figure out what > your equivalent tick rate is or you get an error for not defining it. > Ditto if you try to build code using it on platforms that it is > meaningless (eg S/390) you get an error. > > You'd lose that rather useful property. In that case, I still think it would be good to have it in asm-generic. Half the architectures define it in this way currently, and new architectures would still have to think about it before falling back on the default. Arnd <>< -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
