H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > But how does it break down between "static inline type\nfunction_name" and > > "static inline\ntype function_name"? That's more to the point. > > > > I believe that is the breakdown is roughly what you see above, i.e. over 8:1; > the pattern I used was looking for "^static inline[^;(]*$", and a visual > examination of the results shows that even if my line count is slighly off the > lopsidedness is still dramatic. Sorry, I meant: "static inline type\nfunction_name" vs "static inline type function_name" David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
