On 02/17, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 08:28:10PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > So the question is: is there any arch which surely needs this barrier?
> >
> > IOW,
> > int COND;
> >
> > void smp_xxx_interrupt(regs)
> > {
> > BUG_ON(!COND);
> > }
> >
> > COND = 1;
> > mb();
> > smp_send_xxx(cpu);
> >
> > can we really hit the BUG_ON() above on some arch?
>
> If all of the above is executed by the same task, tripping the BUG_ON()
> means either a compiler or CPU bug.
I think you misunderstood...
smp_send_xxx() sends the ipi to another CPU, and smp_xxx_interrupt() is
the handler.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
