On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 6:06 PM, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Unify all the identical implementations of pmd_free(), __pmd_free_tlb(),
>> pmd_alloc_one(), pmd_addr_end() in include/asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h
>
> NAK for FRV on two fronts:
This patch generates too many followup fixes and it's better to simply drop it
for now.
I think we need to use a different approach and, more important, we need to
clean a lot of .h files before to avoid the include hell problems.
-Andrea
>
> (1) The definition of pud_t in pgtable-nopud.h:
>
> typedef struct { pgd_t pgd; } pud_t;
>
> is not consistent with the one in FRV's page.h:
>
> typedef struct { unsigned long ste[64];} pmd_t;
> typedef struct { pmd_t pue[1]; } pud_t;
> typedef struct { pud_t pge[1]; } pgd_t;
>
> The upper intermediate page table is contained within the page directory
> entry, not the other way around. Having a pgd_t inside a pud_t is
> upside-down, illogical and makes things harder to follow IMNSHO.
>
> (2) It produces the following errors:
>
> mm/memory.c: In function 'free_pmd_range':
> mm/memory.c:176: error: implicit declaration of function '__pmd_free_tlb'
> CC fs/seq_file.o
> mm/memory.c: In function '__pmd_alloc':
> mm/memory.c:2896: error: implicit declaration of function 'pmd_alloc_one_bug'
> mm/memory.c:2896: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast
> mm/memory.c:2905: error: implicit declaration of function 'pmd_free'
>
> David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
