>>> "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx> 18.12.08 10:51 >>> >Agreed. I vote to complement the existing ENDPROC annotation with >the proposed PROC annotation. Let's call that an extension, not >something new ;). As it stands it is not impossible to go with >ENTRY/ENDPROC for code and ENTRY/END for data. However, ENTRY Not really: At least on ia64 these cannot be mixed (and there as well as any other architectures that may have such requirements) replacing ENTRY() with PROC() and END() with ENDPROC() will likely be necessary. >implies alignment and the prefered alignment for code and data >might differ. Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
