On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 04:48:36PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hmm. It is the argument ordering used by NetBSD, thats why I used that > too. It certainly should be the application-visible ordering. We'll > have glibc between apps and kernel though, so I think we can reorder the > arguments at syscall level if that helps on these archs. Cc'ing Ulrich > Drepper for comments on that. On the other hand, NetBSD have approximately 0% market share. We shouldn't let them lock us into making a bad decision. Is there anyone other than NetBSD who has added these syscalls? -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
