On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Russell King wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:07:55AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:29:20AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:19:59 -0600 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > We'd like to pull this trick on parisc as well (another VIPT > > > > architecture), so you can add my ack. > > > > > > If this is going to be used by more than one architecture during the next > > > merge window, then maybe the change to include/linux/highmem.h could be > > > extracted to its own patch and sent to Linus for inclusion in 2.6.28. > > > This way we avoid some conflicts and the architectures can do their > > > updates independently. > > > > I plan to use it on VIPT SH also, so getting the higmem.h change in by > > itself sooner rather than later would certainly be welcome. > > I'll queue the change to linux/highmem.h for when Linus gets back then. > Can I assume that Hugh and James are happy for their ack to apply to > both parts of the split patch? And do I have your ack as well? I rather trusted you on the ARM end of it: I won't be kicking up a fuss if my Acked-by ends up appearing on that part too, but really, it was for the linux/highmem.h end of it. Hugh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
