On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:13:58 -0800
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Are you planning to add writeq() as well?
>
> Yes, I want to add writeq().
> But there's a problem that
> I don't have a plan to use writeq() now, so I can't test writeq() soon.
>
> How is this? I think it isn't bad. I want to hear your opinion.
>
> static inline void writeq(__u64 val, volatile void __iomem *addr)
> {
> writel((unsigned int)val, addr);
> writel((unsigned int)(val >> 32), addr+1);
^
4
> }
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
