On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Introduce a new accept4() system call. The addition of this system call > > > > > /* test_accept4.c > > > > > #ifdef __x86_64__ > > > #define SYS_accept4 288 > > > #elif __i386__ > > ^^^^^^^^ > > defined(__i386__) > > > > > #define USE_SOCKETCALL 1 > > > #define SYS_ACCEPT4 18 > > > #else > > > #error "Sorry -- don't know the syscall # on this architecture" > > > #endif > > > > Anyway, it's just a test program. Succeeded on m68k using socketcall. > > It _should_ work even without the 'defined()'. Didn't it? Yes it worked. > Unknown symbols should expand to '0' in preprocessor value evaluation. Of > course, the compiler may warn about the practice, but it shouldn't be > technically wrong. gcc 4.4 complains: http://www.cyrius.com/journal/gcc/gcc-4.4-preprocessor-errors Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
