On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 14:14 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Introduce a new accept4() system call. The addition of this system call > > > > > /* test_accept4.c > > > > > #ifdef __x86_64__ > > > #define SYS_accept4 288 > > > #elif __i386__ > > ^^^^^^^^ > > defined(__i386__) > > > > > #define USE_SOCKETCALL 1 > > > #define SYS_ACCEPT4 18 > > > #else > > > #error "Sorry -- don't know the syscall # on this architecture" > > > #endif > > > > Anyway, it's just a test program. Succeeded on m68k using socketcall. > > It _should_ work even without the 'defined()'. Didn't it? Lots of symbols are defined with no value, which will result in an empty #if expression and a cpp error. -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
