> if just that patch doesn't make it, well, ok for me. I just think > CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM is superfluous when the runtime configuration > option is present. It should always be "N" because the only other option means "add pointless code of no value whatsoever" Which means strict_devmem really belongs in the bitbucket as a bad idea Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
