Hi, Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 01:53:51PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote: >> This implements a platform-independent version of show_mem(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Looking at this again, does having this as a Kconfig option really make > sense? We have no tristate in-tree users of this that I can see, wouldn't > this be better off in lib/? It would be preferable not to let the > HAVE_foo stuff get out of hand if we can avoid it. I hate the current Kconfig usage, too. But I figured, if I won't obey on such decisions by people who maintain it, it won't have a chance to get in. So, what do you suggest? Moving it to lib/ and have one simple #define if the arch wants to use it or not? Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
