On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 09:28:33PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Nick, > > On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:15:30 +0200 Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > BTW. I do plan to ask Linus to merge this as soon as 2.6.27 opens. > > Hope nobody objects (or if they do please speak up before then) > > Any chance of getting this into linux-next then to see if it > conflicts with/kills anything else? > > If this is posted/reviewed/tested enough to be "finished" then put it in > a tree (or quilt series) and submit it. Hi Stephen, Thanks for the offer... I was hoping for Andrew to pick it up (which he now has). I'm not sure how best to do mm/ related stuff, but I suspect we have gone as smoothly as we are in large part due to Andrew's reviewing and martialling mm patches so well. Not saying that wouldn't happen if the patches went to linux-next, but I'm quite happy with how -mm works for mm development, so I will prefer to submit to -mm unless Andrew asks otherwise. For other developments I'll keep linux-next in mind. I guess it will be useful for me eg in the case where I change an arch defined prototype that requires a big sweep of the tree. Thanks, Nick -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html