On Fri, 30 May 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> Maybe we need another interface that does not do byteswapping but
> provides stronger ordering guarantees?
The byte swapping depends on the device/bus.
So what happened to the old idea of putting the accessor function pointers
in the device/bus structure?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
