Re: [patch 02/41] cpu alloc: The allocator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph Lameter a écrit :
On Fri, 30 May 2008, Eric Dumazet wrote:

+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(UNIT_TYPE, area[UNITS]);
area[] is not guaranteed to be aligned on anything but 4 bytes.

If someone then needs to call cpu_alloc(8, GFP_KERNEL, 8), it might get an non
aligned result.

Either you should add an __attribute__((__aligned__(PAGE_SIZE))),
or take into account the real address of area[] in cpu_alloc() to avoid waste
of up to PAGE_SIZE bytes
per cpu.

I think cacheline aligning should be sufficient. People should not allocate large page aligned objects here.


Hum, maybe, but then we broke modules that might request up to PAGE_SIZE alignement for their percpu section,
if I read your 3rd patch correctly.

Taking into account the ((unsigned long)area & (PAGE_SIZE-1)) offset in cpu_alloc()
should give up to PAGE_SIZE alignment for free.





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux