Re: [PATCH 24/56] microblaze_v2: time support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 May 2008, Michal Simek wrote:
>  > I saw a lot of comments about files but I have never seen any comments that
>  > any file is OK.
>  > Does it mean everything is broken??? I don't think so.
>
<snip>
>
>  I think you're doing a great job on this. Any patch set of this size that
>  has been maintained for a long time outside of the kernel goes through this
>  phase where everyone tells you what to improve, based on their experience,
>  while everything you do right about the patches is just taken for granted.
>
>  Don't let yourself get discouraged by the negative comments, we're really
>  all just trying to help you do the right thing!

Let me add my voice to Arnd's.  This is a *big* task and you're
handling it very well.

Cheers,
g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux