Re: microblaze syscall list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 28 April 2008, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> How about this strategy then:
> * Change all the data types and syscall numbers in the -for-2.6.27
> branch to only include the minimal set, and a modern ABI
> * Add the old interfaces as an out-of-tree patch that adds source
> level compatibility with the old libc, but does not modify any
> of the new interfaces, so that a patched kernel can run all binaries
> built for the upstream version.
> * phase out the old source interface gradually, as all users update
> their libc source code.

Any news on this from the microblaze people? Have you made up your mind
on what route you want to go?

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux