Re: [PATCH 2/10] x86: convert to generic helpers for IPI function calls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jens Axboe wrote:
-int xen_smp_call_function_mask(cpumask_t mask, void (*func)(void *),
-			       void *info, int wait)
[...]
-	/* Send a message to other CPUs and wait for them to respond */
-	xen_send_IPI_mask(mask, XEN_CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR);
-
-	/* Make sure other vcpus get a chance to run if they need to. */
-	yield = false;
-	for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask)
-		if (xen_vcpu_stolen(cpu))
-			yield = true;
-
-	if (yield)
-		HYPERVISOR_sched_op(SCHEDOP_yield, 0);

I added this to deal with the case where you're sending an IPI to another VCPU which isn't currently running on a real cpu. In this case you could end up spinning while the other VCPU is waiting for a real CPU to run on. (Basically the same problem that spinlocks have in a virtual environment.)

However, this is at best a partial solution to the problem, and I never benchmarked if it really makes a difference. Since any other virtual environment would have the same problem, its best if we can solve it generically. (Of course a synchronous single-target cross-cpu call is a simple cross-cpu rpc, which could be implemented very efficiently in the host/hypervisor by simply doing a vcpu context switch...)

   J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux