Re: [PATCH] prepare kconfig inline optimization for all architectures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 08:47:14PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> What I want instead:
> - we continue to force the compiler to always inline with "inline"
> - we remove the inline's in .c files and make too big functions in 
>   headers out-of-line

It doesn't matter whether we use inline or always_inline to force
inlining of a function, that's just syntactical sugar.  What is rather
annoying is that with the config option we'd have something marked
inline without actually meaning it's inline.  And what's even worse
is that this is depending on a user-visible config option which is
entirely stupid.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux